Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17059 (PAT)

Kumari Madhuri v. The State Of Bihar and Ors

CWJC/8891/2018 · 2025-07-17

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8891 of 2018 ====================================================== Kumari Madhuri Daughter of Shivdutt Prasad, Wife of Vidya Sagar Prasad Resident of Village- Mahalpar, P.O. Biharsharif, P.S. Bihar, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Principal Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Director Primary Education, Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. The District Education Officer, Jamui. 5. The District Programme Officer, Jamui. 6. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Baijala-Cum-Chairman, Panchayat Teahcer Employment Committee, Baijala, B 7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Baijala Block- Jhajha, District- Jamui. 8. Kumari Madhuri@ Malti Kumari Wife of Vinod Kumar Gupta R/o Village- Bakara, P.S. Chorsua, District- Nalanda , at Present Vill- Khairma, Ward No. 1, Jamui, P.S. Jamui, District- Jamui. 9. Vinod Kumar Gupta Son of late Hiralal Gupta Resident of Village- Bakara, P.S. Chorsua, District- Nalanda, at Present Village- Khairma Ward No. 1, Jamui, P.S. Jamui, District- Jamui. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kameshwar Kumar- GP17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 17-07-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-17 for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 8 and 9, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application Patna High Court CWJC No.8891 of 2018(3) dt.17-07-2025 2/2 with liberty to pursue his remedy seeking redressal of his grievance in accordance with law before an appropriate forum. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U