Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24152 WP No. 4301 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.4301 OF 2025 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SHRUTHI C. R.
C/O. HARISH B. C.
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS NO. 52/12, 6TH CROSS HANUMAGIRINAGAR, CHIKKALASANDRA BENGALURU – 560 061.
2.
BHAVYA V. P.
D/O. PUTTARAJU V. H.
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS VASTHARE VILLAGE AT POST CHICKMAGALUR TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 133.
3.
AMARNATH M.
S/O. MADLETAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS HUJAGUR VILLAGE THIPPENAHALLI POST, SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT – 562 105.
4.
DR. PRADNYARANI NIDAGUNDI W/O. BASVESH M. WARAD AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS H. NO. 502, DB LAKVEN SPRINGS APARTMENTS COCONUT GARDEN, AYYAPPA NAGAR KODIGEHALLI MAIN ROAD, K.R.PURAM BENGALURU – 560 036. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI GANGADHARAIAH A. N., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24152 WP No. 4301 of 2025
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE VEEDANA VEEDI BENGALURU – 560 001 REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
2.
UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT GKVK BENGALURU – 560 065 REP. BY ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER.
3.
UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES GKVK, BENGALURU – 560 065 BY THE VICE CHANCELLOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI S., H.C.G.P., FOR R-1;
SRI B. S. SACHIN, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE LIST/ORDER AT ANNEXURE-H1 TO H4 AS PER ITS NOTIFICATIONS
1. NO. AO/RT/11/64/CURRENT POSTS/TEACH./AG.ENT./ELIGIBLE AND NOT ELIGIBLE LIST/2024-25 DATED 21.01.2025 (AS ANNEXURE-H1) AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24152 WP No. 4301 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of subsequent event, the prayer sought in the writ petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, the petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. The submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. All pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46