DINESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/1134/2024 · 2025-03-17
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170585 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:15656 Court No. - 6 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1134 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhakar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties specially the opposite parties specially the opposite party no. 2 & 3 to remove the illegal encroachment over the Land Gata No. 207 recorded as pond situated at Village Lauhar Paschim (Pure Jorai), Banakepur, Tehsil-Sadar, District-Sultanpur, which is contained as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice."
3. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of the counter affidavit states that the action is proposed to be taken for cancellation of allotment in favour of the person concerned which is under way.
4. Considering the said statement, the present petition is
disposed off expecting that the action shall be taken in accordance with law as proposed with all expeditions.
Order Date :- 17.3.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench