M/S NASEEM BANO CONTRACTOR LAKHIMPUR KHERI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11287/2024 · 2025-01-21
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170584 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3948-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11287 of 2024 Petitioner :- M/S Naseem Bano Contractor Lakhimpur Kheri And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anurag Narain Srivastava,Prashant Chaurasia,Vartika Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashutosh Bajpai Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Ashutosh Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioners claim to have done some work for the respondent no-3-Executive Officer, Nagar Palika Parishad Mailani District- Lakhimpur way back in the year 2016-17 and claim certain dues. On being asked as to why this petition has been filed after more than 8 years, they submitted that they have been representing the respondent no. 3. The explanation put forth is not acceptable. The limitation for filing a writ petition for recovery of money dues etc. is ordinarily three years. We see no reason to entertain this petition at this belated stage, however, this will not prejudice the opposite parties in considering the claim of the petitioners, if it is under process. Writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 21.1.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench