Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170568 (MAD)

CHRISTIC KOMAS v. ELIZABETH (DIED)

CMP/15069/2019 · 2025-11-06

A D Maria Clete

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 in S.A. No. 1262 of 2014 1.Christic Komas 2.Peter Rock ... Petitioners in both petitions Vs. Elizabeth (Died) 1.Grace Vasantha 2.Sugirtham 3.Rajagambiram (died) 4.Mary Thangaraj 5.Latha Devakirubai 6.John Arunkumar 7.Sunitha 8.R.Kalaivaanan 9.Kanimozhi @ Parimala 10.Kalaivani @ Vani 11.Moovendan Rajagambiram ... Respondents In Both Petitions PRAYER in C.M.P.No.15069 of 2019: To set aside the abatement caused by the death of Rajagambiram, the 3rd respondent and thus render justice. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 PRAYER in C.M.P.No.15070 of 2019: To bring on record the proposed respondents 8 to 11, the legal representative of the deceased 3rd respondent and rank them as respondents 8 to 11 in the above appeal and thus render justice. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Subramanian (in both) For Respondents : Mr. M. Durai Murugan for R1 & R5. R2 & R6 – served – no appearance. R3 Died. R7 – left. R8 to R11 – batta with 4 copies of petition and affidavit due R8 To R11. COMMON ORDER These petitions have been filed to set aside the abatement caused by the death of Rajagambiram, the 3rd respondent and to bring on record the proposed respondents 8 to 11, the legal representative of the deceased 3rd respondent and rank them as respondents 8 to 11 in the above appeal. 2.It is seen from the records that though this petition has been filed in the year 2019, the service has not been effected till date. Though this Court by order dated 22.09.2025, has granted time to effect service, when this matter was taken up for hearing today, no effective steps have been taken to serve the proposed 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 respondents and the cause list reflects has batta with 4 copies of petition and affidavit due regarding R8 to R11, the proposed respondents. 3.In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-payment of process fee. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 06.11.2025 ay Index: Yes / No Speaking Order / Non-speaking Order Neutral Citation: Yes / No 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 DR. A.D. MARIA CLETE, J ay C.M.P.Nos.15069 & 15070 of 2019 in S.A. No. 1262 of 2014 06.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis