MUKESH KUMAR SAHGAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH ITS HOME SECRETARY
CRLA/355/2018 · 2025-10-08
Alok Mahra, Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17056 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17056 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
CRLA No.355 of 2018 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Ms. Prabha Naithani, learned counsel for the appellant.
2. Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned DAG for the State.
3. Instant appeal was decided on 08.10.2025. The order is categorically clear. The Court has issued multiple directions in paragraph no.95 of the
judgment and, in paragraph no.95 (vii), it is specifically stated that the impugned judgment and
order dated 16.10.2018 is modified to the extent as indicated above.
4. Now, a modification application has been filed.
5.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Jail Authorities are denying the jail benefits to the appellant.
6. Let learned State Counsel get instructions on this aspect.
7. List this case on 06.01.2026.
(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.)
24.12.2025 BS