Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170530 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR SINGH v. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/11120/2024 · 2025-01-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:449-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11120 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Singh Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Annapurna Agnihotri,Sudhir Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Jauhari,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard Ms. Annapuran Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Manish Jauhari, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1, 4, 5 and 6. 2. The petitioner alleges encroachment by the Officers of the Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ambedkar Nagar on his agricultural holding, however, learned counsel for the Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited says that construction is being undertaken on the Nigam's own land which has been purchased through a sale deed. 3. Such factual disputes can not be gone into under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. 4. At this State, learned counsel for the petitioner says that demarcation proceedings are pending. If it is so, let the S.D.M. concerned conclude the same at the earliest but in accordance with law, say, within a period of two months. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench