SHAHRUKH KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. AND 3 OTHERS
/11166/2024 · 2025-01-07
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170522 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1007-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11166 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shahrukh Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Development Deptt. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Afghan Khan,Shreet Raj Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard Shri Mohd. Afghan Khan, Advocate assisted by Shri Mohd. Kaif Khan & Shri Abdul Raheem, learned Counsels for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner claims to have performed some work in pursuance to the work order dated 28.03.2023 issued by the Block Development Officer, Hasanganj, Unnao. According to him, the work has been completed on 10.10.2023 but the payment of the dues has not been made. Let the opposite party no. 4, if he is competent in the matter, get the facts verified in the light of the entitlement claimed by the petitioner to the dues, and if he finds after such enquiry that the petitioner is entitled to payment of dues for the work, if any, done by him, then he shall do the needful by making the payment, otherwise, he shall pass a reasoned order and communicate it to the petitioner as to why the payment is not due. Let this exercise be completed within a period of six weeks. It is made clear that we have not adjudicated the entitlement of the petitioner to the dues claimed. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 7.1.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench