SURENDRA MOHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. SECY. DEPTT. HOUSING URBAN PLANNING LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/12857/2024 · 2025-02-24
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11623 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12857 of 2024 Petitioner :- Surendra Mohan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Secy. Deptt. Housing Urban Planning Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press on reliefs no. (i) and (ii) and he only confines the writ petition to relief no. (iii) i.e. a direction to the respondents / Lucknow Development Authority to decide the representation of the petitioner. The consequence of he not pressing the reliefs no. (i) and (ii) have been spelt out to learned counsel for the petitioner Shri Sanjay Awasthi in as much as the letter dated 08.02.2019 categorically states that the resignation of the petitioner has been accepted on 22.05.2018 but yet he states that he does not intend to press the said reliefs. Considering the aforesaid the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 i.e. Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow. In case the said representation is filed then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law keeping in view the observations made above. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 J. K. Dinkar Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench