AHMED ALI @ PAPPU AND 14 OTHERS v. 2nd ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE GONDA AND 3 OTHERS
CMRA/130/2024 · 2025-01-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170512 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2642 Court No. - 7 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 130 of 2024 Applicant :- Ahmed Ali @ Pappu And 14 Others Opposite Party :- 2nd Additional District Judge Gonda And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Gupta,Mohd. Kashif Rafi,Mohd. Mustafizul Haq Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicants.
2. The present application has been filed seeking review of the
judgment dated 11.12.2024.
3. The issue of abandoned relief being beyond limitation is not considered appropriately by the trial court and the revisional court.
4. Considering the fact that the issue of limitation is a mixed question of fact and law, no good ground for interference is made out. The writ petition is dismissed.
5. The applicant would be at liberty to raise the issue of limitation at the time of framing of issue and thereafter at the time of argument.
Order Date :- 15.1.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench