- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22021 WP No. 4324 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 4324 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI NAGARAJ V S/O LATE VEERASANGHACHAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT NO 22, 1ST MAIN ROAD 5TH CROSS, NEAR APPOLLO MEDICAL JAYANAGAR MYSURU -570 014 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.229, 1ST MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS B ZONE, SATHAGALLI MYSURU -570019. …PETITIONER (BY SRI M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LOCAL HEAD OFFICE GRAPE GARDEN, NO.27 3RD A CROSS, 18TH MAIN 6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE -560 096. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUHORIZED OFFICER MR PUSHPAKANTH R S/O RAMANATHAN AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK CHAMARAJA DOUBLE ROAD BRANCH, K R MOHALLA MYSORE 570001 …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by VIDYA G R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22021 WP No. 4324 of 2025 (BY SRI JOSEPH ANIL KUMAR A., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 26/12/2024 PASSED IN CRL. MISC. No.250/2024 BY THE COURT OF II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AT MYSURU IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo of undertaking which reads as follows: “The petitioner has complied with the interim orders passed by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner in the above case hereby undertakes to regularize the housing loan availed by the petitioner within a period of 3 months from today. Therefore, this Hon’ble Tribunal be pleased to permit the Petitioner to regularize the housing loan with the Respondent bank as stated above, in the interest of justice and equity. The petitioner further undertakes that in the event of default of making payment as stated above, the Respondent Bank shall be at liberty to proceed against the appellants in accordance with law.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22021 WP No. 4324 of 2025 2. Learned counsel for the respondent bank states that they are agreeable to consider the offer. 3. In view of the memo, petition stands disposed of not calling for any adjudication in light of offer of the petitioner being agreeable to the respondents’ bank. Needless to state in the event of petitioner committing breach of the undertaking, petition will stand revived. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE MR