IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.9627 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.6.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Praveen Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Naresh Kaul and Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 13.6.2025, issued by the Director of School Education, Shimla, Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, states that petitioner has been relieved. 2. Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner while acknowledging factum with regard to relieving of the petitioner, fairly states that on account of subsequent development, present petition has been rendered infructuous. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings, accordingly, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending applications if any. June 19, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge