Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17050 (GAU)

MONOWAR HUSSAIN KHALIFA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2496/2025 · 2025-08-04

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010156952025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2496/2025 in WP(C)/4210/2025 MONOWAR HUSSAIN KHALIFA S/O LATE JABED ALI VILL- HOJUAR CHAR PT-III P.O.- BALARBHITA P.S.- CHUNARI DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783129 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783101 3:THE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER GOALPARA DIST- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN-783101 ------------ Advocate for : MR J ABEDIN Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for : SC P AND R.D. appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 05.08.2025 Heard Shri J. Abedin, learned counsel for the applicant / writ petitioner, who by means of this application has prayed for a correction to be made in the connected writ petition. It has been submitted that while describing the respondents, the district Dhubri has inadvertently been typed out which should be Goalpara district. He has also pointed out in paragraph 6, a date has been written as 17.03.2025, it should be 17.06.2025 and further in prayer no. 2, instead of annexure 5, annexure 2 should have been written. After hearing the learned counsel, the aforesaid 3 corrections are allowed to be done. The I.A. accordingly stands allowed by permitting the learned counsel to file a corrected/amended writ petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant