Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17049 (JHR)

YAMUNA SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3949/2024 · 2025-02-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3949 of 2024 ------ 1. Yamuna Singh age 68 S/O Late Ghanshyam Singh. 2. Manjho Singh age 60 years S/O Late Ghanshyam Singh. 3. Ravi Hajam age 30 years S/O Nand Kishore Hajam. 4. Nandkishore Hazam age 60 years S/O Late Foudari Hazam. 5. Basant Singh age 54 S/O Late Ghanshyam Singh. All resident of village Nawadih, Post Office-Budhudih, Police Station-Ahilyapur, District-Giridih. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : None ------ Order No.05 Dated- 20/02/2025 No one turns up on behalf of either of the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.06 of 2024 instituted under Sections 147, 148, 342, 343, 325, 326, 307, 354B, 379, 504, 506, 427, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. It has been averred in the petition of the instant anticipatory bail application that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, were member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of the common object of the assembly attempted to murder Nunulal Yadav, Suresh Yadav, Badri Mahto and Sunil Yadav and disrobed the female members of the family. It is further averred that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is further averred that for the self-same occurrence, the wife of the petitioner no.3 has lodged Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.09 of 2024 against the informant and others. It is next averred that the injuries sustained by the injured persons are not on the vital part of the body. It is next averred that there was a free fight between the parties because of family dispute. It is next averred that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is also averred that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any terms and conditions imposed upon them by this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Giridih in connection with Ahilyapur P.S. Case No.06 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or victim or any of their family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/