Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170488 (ALL)

VIJAY PAL SINGH v. MADHYANCHAL VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM U.P. LKO. THRU. MANAGING DIRECTOR AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/11368/2024 · 2025-01-16

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2664-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11368 of 2024 Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Singh Respondent :- Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam U.P. Lko. Thru. Managing Director And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shyam Bahadur Counsel for Respondent :- Sri Shailendra Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner disputes the bill dated 17.05.2023. It is a case of electricity theft. There are remedies prescribed under the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act, 2003 or the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005, which have not been availed. We decline to entertain this writ petition in these circumstances. 3. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed with liberty to pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench