Ayyappan v. State rep. by The Sub Inspector of Police
CRL OP/36040/2025 · 2025-12-30
P Dhanabal
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170487 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170487 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 30.12.2025 CORAM THE HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL OP.No.36040 of 2025 Ayyappan S/o.Srinivasan ... Petitioner/Accused 1 Vs State represented by: The Sub Inspector of Police, Tiruttani Police Station, Tiruvallur. [Cr. No.315 of 2025] .... Respondent/ Complainant PRAYER: - The Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., praying to grant bail to the petitioner / Accused 1 in Cr.No.315 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Parthiban For Respondent : Mr. S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner/Accused 1, who was arrested on 16.10.2025 and remanded to judicial custody on the same day for the offences punishable under Section Man Missing @ 140(1), 103, 238 of BNS in Cr.No.315 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the victim and the petitioner, due to which, the petitioner stabbed the victim on his stomach using a knife and inflicted further cuts on the body of the victim and hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had not committed any offence as alleged and the petitioner had been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties for his due release and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court and therefore, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed for granting bail to the petitioner by stating that out of a wordy quarrel, the victim was stabbed on his stomach with a knife by the petitioner and also inflicted with cuts in his body. He would further submit that the investigation is completed and there is no previous case as against the petitioner. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6.Considering the representations made on both sides and considering the nature of offence, the fact that the co-accused were released on bail and that there is no previous case as against the petitioner, investigation is completed and also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner from 16.10.2025, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the learned Jurisdictional Magistrate on all working days at 10.30 A.M., until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he was accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.2023. 30.12.2025 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No ssa/gya Note:
1.
Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Tiruttani. 2.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Tiruttani Police Station, Tiruvallur. 4. The Superintendent, Central Prison-II, Puzhal. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.36040 of 2025 P.DHANABAL
,J ssa/gya CRL.O.P. No.36040 of 2025 30.12.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis