MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA v. PRIN. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX INVESTIGATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/375/2024 · 2025-01-16
Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170487 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2689-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 375 of 2024 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Sharma Respondent :- Prin. Director Of Income Tax Investigation Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arunendra Nath Mishra,Prashant Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Kushagra Dikshit Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Let the petitioner implead the District Rural Development Agency, Hardoi through its Project Director as an opposite party in this petition.
3. Considering the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the newly impleaded opposite party is dispensed with.
4. Being aggrieved by the incorrect deduction of TDS by the Project Director, District Rural Development Agency, Hardoi an application has been submitted to opposite party no.2, whereupon opposite party no.2, as informed by the counsel for the Revenue, has written to the deductor, but till date the issue has not been resolved.
5. Let the newly impleaded opposite party look into the matter and do the needful. If it does not do so, then opposite party no.2 may see as to whether it has jurisdiction to intervene and resolve the matter as per law and if, it has jurisdiction, then it shall do the needful as per law but with expedition.
6. Writ petition is accordingly disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025/Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench