Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010170552023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4471/2023 SHAHIDA AHMAD D/O- ABDUL HOQUE, VILL- MANDIA, P.O. MANDIA BAZAR, DIST.- BARPETA, PIN- 781308 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BARPETA PIN- 781301 3:THE ZILLA PARISHAD BARPETA PIN- 781301 REPRESENTED BY THE C.E.O. BARPETA Z.PARISHAD 4:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER BARPETA ZILLA PARISHAD PIN- 781301 5:THE MANDIA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER MANDIA A.P. P.O. MANDIA DIST.- BARPETA PIN- 781308 Page No.# 2/2 6:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER MANDIA A.P. P.O. MANDIA DIST.- BARPETA PIN- 781308 7:HAZRAT ALI S/O- LATE RAHIM UDDIN VILL- MANDIA GAON P.O. MANDIA DIST.- BARPETA PIN- 78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ROSHID, MS. T BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : SC, P AND R.D., GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 28.05.2025 Heard Shri A. Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat and Rural Development Department as well as Shri M. Chetia, learned State Counsel. Shri Roshid, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant