MUKESH SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLR/1548/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170477 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:447 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1548 of 2024 Revisionist :- Mukesh Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Anil Kumar Sharma,Shivam Mishra,Sunil Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ajeet Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.Vakalatnama filed by Shri Ajeet Kumar Mishra on behalf of respondent No.2 is taken on record. 2.Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent and learned counsel for respondent No.2. 3.This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 06.12.2024 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court No.1, Gonda in Criminal Misc. Case No.501 of 2024 by which the application moved by the revisionist under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. for filing written statement has been rejected and the right of the revisionist to file written statement/objection in case No.342/2017 (Smt. Vandana vs. Mukesh) has been closed. The relevant part of the order dated 06.12.2024 passed by the learned family court is extracted below:-
"
उक ववशललषण सल यह सपष हह रहह हह वक ववपकक ममकल श नल ममलबहद कल वनसतहरण कह
जहनबमझकर ववलममबत वकयह हह और जहनबमझकर समय सल न तह आपतत पसतमत वकयह हह
न हक ररकहल पहररनह पत पसतमत वकयह।
महमलल कल तथय एवव पररमसरवतयय कह दलखतल हहए पहररनह पत 3
क वनरसत हहनल यहगय हह। आदलश
पहरर शक ममकल श शमहर दहरह पसतमत पहररनह पत 3
क वनरसत वकयह जहतह हह। पसतमत
पतहवलक और दहमणणक वहद सवखयह 342/2017
कक पतहवलक वनयमहनमसहर दहतखल दफतर हह।" 4.A perusal of the order shows that multiple opportunities have been given to the revisionist on various occasions. From perusal of the impugned order it is also evident that revisionist has deliberately delayed the trial in spite of the fact that file was part of action plan of 2023-24 of this High Court. There appears to be no illegality in the order impugned. The revision is devoid
of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench