SHYAM JEE BHARTI v. AVANESH TRIPATHI SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE SADAR GONDA
CAPL/4812/2024 · 2025-02-12
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170473 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9123 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4812 of 2024 Applicant :- Shyam Jee Bharti Opposite Party :- Avanesh Tripathi Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar Gonda Counsel for Applicant :- Shrikant Mishra,Avadhesh Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The present contempt petition has been preferred for non- compliance of the judgement and order dated 31.05.2024, passed in the petition Matter Under Article 227 No.2869 of 2024, the relevant extract is quoted hereinbelow:
"6. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner and without entering into the merit of the case, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an urgency application for early disposal of the Case No. 485 of 2023, titled as Rama Shankar Bharti versus Sunder Lal, filed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, which is pending since 17.06.2023. If any such application is preferred, it is expected that respondent no. 2 shall make an endeavour to decide the urgency application preferred by the petitioner expeditiously in accordance with law, after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without providing any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. " Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that in compliance of judgement and order dated 31.05.2024, passed in the petition Matter Under Article 227 No.2869 of 2024, the proceeding under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided by order dated 06.02.2025, copy of which has been produced during course of argument, which is taken on record.
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order passed by the writ court, the claim of the applicant has been decided and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. Order Date :- 12.2.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench