KAILASHNATH KHARWAR ENGINEER ZILA PANCHAYAT AMETHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/12634/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170453 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:241 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12634 of 2024 Petitioner :- Kailashnath Kharwar Engineer Zila Panchayat Amethi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kashi Nath Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Kashi Nath Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondents. 2. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present case is with regard to none grant of benefit of assured carrier progression (ACP) which was not granted to the petitioner in terms of Government Order dated 19.09.2014. 3. It is stated that petitioner who was working on the post of Engineer in District Panchayat, Amethi retired upon reaching the age of superannuation on 30.11.2016 and immediately thereafter has raised his grievance with regard to none grant of the benefit of the ACP and his representation was duly forwarded on 22.12.2017 to the competent authority. 4. It is stated that despite expiry of substantial period of time, no decision has been taken by the Government in this regard and further submits that by means of letter dated 14.02.2024, Additional Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Amethi... has forwarded the grievance of the petitioner to the State Government and the State Government in turn forwarded the matter to respondent No. 2 which is pending consideration and has not been decided even after expiry of more than 10 months before respondent No. 2
5. In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner submits that grievances of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner and the State Government in turn forwarded the matter to respondent No. 2 and is presently pending consideration before respondent No. 2. 6. In light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before
respondent No. 2 within two weeks from today and in case such a representation is moved, respondent No. 2 shall proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks thereafter by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner.
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench