Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170450 (ALL)

MOTI LAL v. SHRI SANJEEV RANJAN, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE DISTRICT PRATAPGARH

CAPL/4817/2024 · 2025-02-12

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9190 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4817 of 2024 Applicant :- Moti Lal Opposite Party :- Shri Sanjeev Ranjan, District Magistrate District Pratapgarh Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The present contempt petition has been preferred for non- compliance of the judgement and order dated 23.09.2024 passed in Writ-A No.8359 of 2024, the relevant extract is quoted hereinbelow: "5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2 i.e., District Magistrate, Pratapgarh ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 10 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. " Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instruction received from the respondent has submitted that the judgement and order of the writ court has been complied with by order dated 4.2.2025, copy of which has been produced during course of argument, which is taken on record. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. Order Date :- 12.2.2025/S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench