Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17045 (RAJ)

KULDEEP SHARMA S/O SHRI CHAITANYA KUMAR SHARMA v. SMT. SHUBHRA SINGH

CCP/370/2024 · 2025-08-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32438] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 370/2024 1. Kuldeep Sharma S/o Shri Chaitanya Kumar Sharma, Aged About 49 Years, R/o House No. B-23, Shivaji Nagar, Baran District Baran 2. Sumit Porwal S/o Shri Prakash Hand Gupta, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Purani Nakoda Colony, Babaji Nagar Road, Baran District Baran 3. Kapil Gautam S/o Shri Om Prakash Gautam, Aged About 42 Years, R/o B-13, New Nakoda Colony, Anta, Baran District Baran 4. Dinesh Suman S/o Shri Satya Praksh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Satyapraksh, Tel Factory, Dandotiya Ki Badi, Baran 5. Anand Kumar Jain S/o Rishabh Chand Jain, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Main Bazar, Shahbad, District Baran 6. Arvind Kumar S/o Gyarsi Lal, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No.9, Khan Satalkheri, Ramganjmandi, Kota Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. Smt. Shubhra Singh, Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan 2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Additional Director (Administration) Medical And Health Services Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order [2025:RJ-JP:32438] (2 of 2) [CCP-370/2024] 19/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have complied with the directions and, therefore, this contempt petition no more survives. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present civil contempt petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The petitioners would be at liberty to challenge the order passed on the representation, if he has any grievance. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /152