Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:17826 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5358 of 2025
------
1. Jagal @ Jagal Tudu @ Jugal Tudu @ Jagan Tudu, aged about 19 years, son of Babudhan Tudu, Resident of village-Bara Balrampur, P.O. & P.S.-Hiranpur, District-Pakur.
2. Dipti @ Diti @ Dipti Marandi @ Diti Marandi, aged about 23 years son of Sitaram Marandi, Resident of Village Dohri Santhli, P.O. & P.S.-Littipara, District-Pakur.
.... .... …. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Tarun Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 03-07-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Hiranpur P.S. Case No.63 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) & 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed murder of Melcho Marandi. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that except the confessional statement of the co- accused Babudhan Tudu, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, as has been mentioned in para-11 of this bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is also submitted that the co-accused persons have already been admitted to bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 24.03.2025 passed in B.A. No.2274 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 02.05.2025 as is evident from para-01 of this bail application.
Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Pakur in connection with Hiranpur P.S. Case No.63 of 2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/