IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL.O.P.No.29476 of 2025 Thangavel Petitioner Vs The State Represented by its Inspector of Police, Beta-IV, EDF-II, CCB (Central Crime Branch) Police Station, Veppary, Chennai District – 07. Cr.No. Not known of 2025. ....Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.Arivazhagan For Respondent : Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 316, 318(4) r/w 351(2) of BNS Act, 2023 in Crime No. Not known of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that petition enquiry is pending. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. K.RAJASEKAR, J. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis kmm 4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the respondent police has to issue notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C to the petitioner and the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police and the Investigating Officer has to conduct the enquiry by strictly following the procedures therein and if any prima facie case is made out against the petitioner, register the F.I.R or close the petition enquiry within a period of three (3) weeks from today. The parties are directed to cooperate with the enquiry. It is needless to say that the respondent police shall not take any coercive steps to secure the accused till the completion of enquiry on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant. 5. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. 05.11.2025 kmm To 1. The Inspector of Police, Beta-IV, EDF-II, CCB (Central Crime Branch) Police Station, Veppary, Chennai District – 07. 2. The Public Prosecutor Madras High Court. Crl.O.P.No.29476 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis