Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:17593-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 247 of 2025 Nagendra Singh Thakur S/o Uday Bhan Singh Aged About 58 Years Posted As Assistant Director (Finance) OfÏce Of Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
... Appellant(s) versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department of Finance Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.)
2. Under Secretary Department of Finance, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, District - Raipur (C.G.)
3. Director Directorate of Treasury Account and Pension Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.)
4. Divisional Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
5. Ajay Kumar Sahu Assistant Director (Finance) Directorate of Agriculture Naya Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Appellant : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.04.22 14:22:55 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma,
Judge
Judgment
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
17 .04.2025
1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken through video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. Yashwant Singh Thakur, learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 4/State.
3. The present intra Court appeal has been filed by the appellant/writ petitioner against the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No. 645 of 2025 (Nagendra Singh Thakur vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant/writ petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal has become infructuous, as the appellant/writ petitioner has already joined the service where he was transferred.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha)
Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan