TANJEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/11199/2024 · 2025-01-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170436 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1503-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11199 of 2024 Petitioner :- Tanjeem Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and Sri Ashish Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for opposite parties no.4 and 5.
2. The petitioner alleges encroachment on public/nazul land. An order dated 07.09.2017 has been passed under Section 27(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 by the Vice-Chairman, Faizabad Development Authority (Now Ayodhya Development Authority), a copy of which is annexed as Annexure-1, but the same is not being implemented. However, learned Standing Counsel says that an appeal has been filed by the aggrieved person, which is pending before the Commissioner, Faizabad (Now Ayodhya) Division.
3. Without entering into the merits of the issues involved and dispensing the requirement of issuance of notice to opposite party no.6, we dispose of this petition with a direction to opposite party no.2 to dispose of the appeal, if it is pending, at the earliest, say, within one month unless there is any legal impediment, in which the case the same shall be informed to the Vice-Chairman, Ayodhya Development Authority and the petitioner. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench