DAYARAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
/11284/2024 · 2025-01-09
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:1655-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11284 of 2024 Petitioner :- Dayaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner's counsel says that the private opposite parties are attempting to grab the petitioner's land.
3. If it is so the remedy lies elsewhere and not before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may initiate proceedings under civil or criminal law as the case may be, especially as, it it is the submission of the petitioner's counsel that the private opposite parties are in the process of grabbing the land of the petitioner.
4. The petition is dismissed. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 9.1.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench