Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170380 (ALL)

GOPAL SINGH AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/11181/2024 · 2025-01-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:420-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11181 of 2024 Petitioner :- Gopal Singh And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Maurya,Bachchu Lal,Chandan Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioners seek recording of their names in the revenue records pertaining to the land in question. 3. This cannot be done under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially as, the petitioners' counsel says that some order has been passed against the petitioners under Section 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, if it is so, then the remedy, if at all, is under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 4. The petition is disposed of. [Brij Raj Singh, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench