KM KINTU SAINI @ KINTU SAINI v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF AYUSH, NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WRIC/11318/2024 · 2025-09-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170369 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170369 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11318 of 2024 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Devak Vardhan, learned counsel for respondent No.4, Shri Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.7 and 8 and learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
2. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that although, the petitioner was selected in the NEET Examination conducted by respondent No.4 for the academic year 2022-23 on the basis of MOP-UP counseling conducted on 01.03.2023. The petitioner could not upload the documents as respondent No.9 did not permit the uploading of the data. It is further argued that the petitioner is studying with respondent Nos.7 and 8, which fact is admitted by learned counsel for respondent Nos.7 and 8.
3. My attention is also drawn to the similar orders passed by this Court in the case of Soni Verma and others Vs. Union of India and others; Writ- C No.3075 of 2024 as well as in the case of Arbaz Alam Vs. Union of India and others; Writ-C No.3748 of 2024, whereby the Court had directed respondent No.9 as well as respondent No.4 to upload the names of the petitioners on portal/website.
4. In view of the said orders, the petitioner is also entitled to get the benefit of the same orders. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Kumar, Adarsh Tripathi, Shubham Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Devak Vardhan, Pramod Kumar, Umesh Singh Km Kintu Saini @ Kintu Saini .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Ayush, New Delhi And Others .....Respondent(s)
5. The details of the petitioner shall be permitted to be uploaded by respondent No.9 by opening their portal. The necessary benefits that inflow in favour of the petitioner by virtue of the petitioner studying with respondent Nos.7 and 8 shall be followed in her favour.
6. The petition stands disposed of. September 9, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 11318 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench