Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:291-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11074 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Devaki Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rinku Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioner's claim for compensation under the Krishak Durghatna Yojana has been declined on the ground that the deceased was neither a farmer nor was undertaking any agricultural work after taking the land on lease. However, petitioner's counsel relies upon the Krishi Bhumi Batai Praman Patra which is countersigned by Lekhpal and Revenue Inspector. 3. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand refers to a report dated 21.11.2020 of S.D.M., Kunda which is mentioned in the impugned order which is the basis for rejection of the claim. 4. These are all factual issues which can't be seen under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petitioner may approach District Magistrate, Pratapgarh raising her greivance in the matter with supporting proof and if the District Magistrate finds that facts and documents being relied have not been taken into consideration then he shall get the matter inquired and do the needful. However, if he finds that all facts and documents have been taken into consideration then he shall communicate it to the petitioner along with report of the S.D.M. dated 21.11.2020 as the case may be. Let this exercise be completed within six weeks. 5. With these observations/ direction, the petition is disposed of. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 3.1.2025/Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench