PANKAJ MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/11455/2024 · 2025-01-20
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:3358-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11455 of 2024 Petitioner :- Pankaj Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Shankar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
2. The petitioner claims to have purchased some land, but, now he finds that there is a Panchayat Bhawan existing thereon or may have been constructed subsequent to the said purchase.
3. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus that his land be vacated and the illegal possession of the Panchayat Bhawan by opposite parties no. 1 to 7 and the colony belonging to the opposite party no. 8 be removed.
4. The opposite parties no. 1 to 7 are Officials opposite parties. The opposite party no. 8 is a private party. The petitioner himself claims to have purchased some land. It is not a matter amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 20.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench