JITENDRA KUMAR PASI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/13182/2024 · 2025-05-01
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170291 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25812 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13182 of 2024 Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Pasi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant and Ms. Nikita Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.144 of 2024, under Sections 376, 506 I.P.C. and Section 67-A of IT Act, registered at Police Station Bale Sultan Shaheed Smarak, District Amethi. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 22.09.2024 stating that the applicant has been sexually exploiting her and raping her since 12.04.2023 and he has posted her obscene photographs and video on social media. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 180 BNSS, she stated that she used to talk to the applicant since 12.04.2013 till 12. 06.2024. The applicant made physical relation with her and photographed the incident. When the victim stopped talking to the applicant, the applicant started sending her obscene photographs to some other persons and he also sent those photographs and video to the victim's husband also. The victim declined to undergo medico legal examination. In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS, she alleged that her marriage was scheduled for November 2024 and the applicant had sent her obscene photos
and video to her prospective husband. He also sent the video to several persons in the village. 4. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith the material collected during investigation. During investigation, one witness Robin Kumar has stated that her negotiations for settlement of her marriage with the informant were going on and when the applicant came to know about it, he sent him obscene photo and video of the informant/ victim to him. 5. Having considered the aforesaid conduct of the applicant, I am of the considered view that the facts of this case do not warrant exercise of power by this Court to enlarge the applicant on bail. 6. The bail application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 1.5.2025 (Manoj K.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench