Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
^ THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAIM MONDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE IN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM r.lVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1003 OF 2020 Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by O.S.No.35/2020 on the Petition under the Order dated 13-08-2020 in I.A.No.153/2020 in Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, Nellore district. file of the Between; Vada Lakshman Reddy, S/o. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged about 49 years, Swamidass School, Vasavi Nagar, Balaji Nagar R/o d.No. 27-2-474, Near Nellore city, Nellore District ...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff AND Konduru Madhava, S/o Thirupathalah, Aged about 42 years R/o D.No.27- Behind Addala Saibaba Mandhiram, Pedmavathi Nagar, Nellore Nellore District 3-195 ...Respondent/Respondent/Defendant lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim Injunction restrain the respondent herein from L
alienating and creating any change over this Petition Schedule property t nrentioned in I.A.No.153/2020 in O.S.No.35/2020 on the file of the Principal > Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. B SURYANARAYANA The Court made the following Order:
APHC010229852020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 3459 MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHl JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1003 OF 2020 Between: Vada Lakshman Reddy. Petitioner and Konduru Madhava. Respondent Sri Harinath Reddy Soma Sri B. Suryanarayana Counsel for the petitioner Counsel for the respondent The Court made the following ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing,
learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this Court that the cause in the Civil Revision Petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// To, N OFFICER T The Principal Senior if any)
2. One CC to Sri.
3. One GO to Sri.
4. Three CD Copies Civil Judge, Nellore, Nellore district, (with Harinath Reddy Soma, Advocate [OPUC] B Suryanarayana, Advocate records [OPUCJ vna
HIGH COURT DATED:10/03/2025
ORDER CRP.No.1003 of 2020 * 2 8 MAK 7m \ ^ . Currerii ^eciion . . %Ss£ffSPATCH^^ fr.
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS