Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170251 (ALL)

ASLAM KHAN AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 15 OTHERS

WRIC/11447/2024 · 2025-01-16

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2746-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11447 of 2024 Petitioner :- Aslam Khan And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 15 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd.Murtaza Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. Petitioners' counsel is not able to satisfy us as to application/ objection as contained in Annexure no.8 before the S.D.M., Balrampur has been filed in some pending proceedings. The case number of the proceedings is also not mentioned on the application. We are, therefore, no inclined to exercise our extraordinary jurisdiction in the matter. The petitioner, if they have a cause, can approach the concerned authorities or file a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as in any case in view of our recent judgment dated 23.11.2024 passed in Writ-C No.10001 of 2024 'Vidhya Vati vs. District Magistrate, District Amethi & Ors', the appropriate remedy is by a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, if there is a cause. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 16.1.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench