1 2025:CGHC:15092 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2053 of 2022 1 - Jhabbulal Sahu S/o Shri Vishram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Ahilda, R/o Village And Post Ahilda, Tahsil Lawan, Civil And Revenue Balodabajar Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Balodabajar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPC No. 5761 of 2022 1 - Jhabbulal Sahu S/o Shri Vishram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Sarpanch Of Gram Panchayat Ahilda, R/o Village And Post - Ahilda Tahsil - Lawan, Civil And Revenue Distt.- Balodabajar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Chhattisgarh State Election Commission Through Chief Election Officer, Sector- 19 North Block Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Cum District Election Officer Balodabajar, Distt.- Balodabajar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Rrevenue) Balodabajar, District- Balodabajar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Balodabajar, District- Balodabajar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Tahsildar Balodabajar, District- Balodabajar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate For respondents : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General, Ms. Rakshita Mishra, Advocate, Ms. Shweta Kumari, Advocate Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 28/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the recent elections, petitions have been rendered infructuous 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, these petitions are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna JUDGE