Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17023 (CHH)

Gorelal v. Rajendra Kumar

MAC/1174/2015 · 2025-04-21

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MAC No. 1174 of 2015 1 - Gorelal S/o Purushottam Khande, Aged About 45 Years Caste - Suryavanshi, R/o Village And Police Station - Pamgarh, Tahsil And District Revenue And Civil - Janjgir – Champa, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sukhin W/o Gorelal Aged About 40 Years Caste - Suryavanshi, R/o Village And Police Station - Pamgarh, Tahsil And District Revenue And Civil - Janjgir - Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellants Versus 1 - Rajendra Kumar S/o Dudhnath, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village - Pendra, Near State Bank Amarpur Road, Tahsil And Police Station - Pendra, District Revenue And Civil - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Nandram Maravi S/o Kunwarlal Maravi Died Through LRs. 2.A - Dhirja Maravi W/o Late Nandlal Maravi, R/o Village - Tiwarata, Police Station - Pali, District Revenue And Civil – Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2.B - Vikas Maravi S/o Late Nandlal Maravi, R/o Village - Tiwarata, Police Station - Pali, District Revenue And Civil – Korba, Chhattisgarh. 2.C - Vikesh Kumar Maravi S/o Late Nandlal Maravi, R/o Village - Tiwarata, Police Station - Pali, District Revenue And Civil – Korba, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through - Division Manager, Divisional Office - Rama Trade Centre, Near Bus Stand Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Revenue And Civil – Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondents : None. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 15.03.2024 1. None appears for the appellant. An earlier order sheet of this Court dated 03.01.2024 shows that no one is appearing to argue the case. 2 2. The record would show that earlier also, the appeal has been dismissed on default. 3. In these circumstances, it appears that the appellants are not interested in this case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge H.L. Sahu