MOHD. NASEEM AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11141/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170228 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:413-DB
Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11141 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mohd. Naseem And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faisal Ahmad Khan,Adnan Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The petitioners claim that even after affirmation of the report by the S.D.M. regarding demarcation of the land of the petitioner the same has not been carried out on the spot.
3. Let the S.D.M., Tehsil- Patti, District- Pratapgarh get the
facts verified and do the needful as per law at the earliest, say, within a period of three weeks. If there is any legal impediment in enforcing the orders, if any, passed under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, then, he shall communicate the same to the petitioners in writing.
4. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 3.1.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench