Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170212 (ALL)

ANKIT KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/12023/2024 · 2025-01-03

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:310 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12023 of 2024 Applicant :- Ankit Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Chandra Srivastava,Vaibhav Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present petition has been filed to quash the criminal proceeding and impugned summoning order dated 23-03-2018, order of Bailable Warrant dated 28-10-2024, passed by the A.C.J.M., Court No. 20, Sultanpur in Crl. Case No. 1069/ 2017, U/S392, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., 1860 P.S. Jaisinghpur, District Sultanpur, Mukesh Kumar vs. Ankit Kumar and Others, pending in the court of the A.C.J.M., Court No. 20, Sultanpur. Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing for some time, submits that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the petitioners Ankit Kumar, Hari Kumar and Manjeet Kumar, appear before the trial court within two weeks from today and apply for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra). Order Date :- 3.1.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench