Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.No.41564 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 05.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.41564 of 2025 Mohammed Yunus .... Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Mayiladuthurai District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Mayiladuthurai District. 3.The Tahsildar Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 4.The Executive Officer Arulmighu Manmadha Swami Kovil Kuthalam Town, Mayiladuthurai District. .... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to conduct a proper enquiry by considering the petitioner's representations dated 16.06.2025 and 17.09.2025 and issue Patta in the name of the petitioner for the properties situated in Survey No.688/3 (Old Survey No.119C/15) Kuthalam Town, Mayiladuthurai District, within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court and 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41564 of 2025 pass orders. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Dinesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.K.Karthikeyan Government Advocate for R4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issue of Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to conduct proper enquiry based on the representations made by the petitioner on 16.06.2025 and 17.09.2025 and issue patta in the name of the petitioner with respect to the subject property. 2. Heard Mr.Dinesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 3 and Mr.K.Karthikeyan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the fourth respondent. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3 and learned Government Advocate appearing for the fourth respondent submitted that, 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41564 of 2025 already orders have been passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Mayiladuthurai, through proceedings dated 19.09.2025, rejecting the claim made by the petitioner. A copy of the order was also placed before this Court. 4. In the light of the above development, no further orders can be passed by this Court in this writ petition. If the petitioner is aggrieved, it is left open to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. 5. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 05.11.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes / No ds 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41564 of 2025 To: 1.The District Collector Mayiladuthurai District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Mayiladuthurai District. 3.The Tahsildar Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 4.The Executive Officer Arulmighu Manmadha Swami Kovil Kuthalam Town, Mayiladuthurai District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.No.41564 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. ds W.P.No.41564 of 2025 05.11.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis