Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17017 (UTT)

ANIL CHANDRA SEN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1272/2025 · 2025-12-18

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No . Da t e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:11346 WPCRL No.1272 of 2025 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. Mr. Tribhuwan Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned AGA with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the present matter final report has been submitted and the present writ petition has become infructuous. This fact is also admitted by the learned State Counsel. 4. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having infructuous. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 1 8 .1 2 .2 0 2 5 Nitesh/