KM. SAKSHI (MINOR) THRU. HER FATHER JITENDRA KUMAR AND 2 OTHERS v. U.O.I. THRU. ITS SECY. (SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY)MINISTRY OF EDUCATION,NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
WRIC/10943/2024 · 2025-01-15
Manish Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170152 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:2405 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10943 of 2024 Petitioner :- Km. Sakshi (Minor) Thru. Her Father Jitendra Kumar And 2 Others Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Its Secy. (School Education And Literacy)Ministry Of Education,New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shrikant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Pushpila Bisht,Shashank Bhasin Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Shashank Bhasin,
learned counsel for opposite parties no. 2 & 5 and Mr. Pushpila Bisht, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 3 & 4. No one has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party no. 1. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authorities to take necessary steps in terms of recommendations made by school concerned pertaining to correction in the name of petitioners in the Marks Statement-cum-Certificate of Secondary School Examination-2022 and for issuance of corrected Marks Statement-cum-Certificate with regard to petitioner no. 1 bearing Roll No. 23219203 and as per records of Senior Secondary Mark Sheet-cum-Certificate pertaining to petitioner no. 1 bearing Roll No. 23713149. 3. In pursuance of directions issued earlier, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 2 and 5 has adverted to letter dated 01.03.2024 issued by the Central Board of Secondary Education to the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya concerned, a copy of which is taken on record, to submit that certain original documents had been sought by the C.B.S.E. for purposes of verification of corrections which have been sought by petitioner. It is submitted that since corrections sought are of a substantial nature, verification by original documentation is required. 4. Learned counsel for opposite parties no.3 and 4 on the basis of instructions submits that no requisition pertaining to original documentation was ever sought by C.B.S.E. and some original documents have already been submitted by school with the Board. 5. Upon perusal of letter dated 01.03.2024, it appears that
certain relevant documents such as newspaper clipping, affidavit, Gazette notification etc. have been sought by the Board for purposes of verification of corrections sought by petitioner. 6. In view of aforesaid letter, the opposite party no. 5 i.e. Regional Officer, Central Board of Secondary Education, Prayagraj is directed to issue a letter to petitioner and school concerned, if required, requisitioning relevant documents to be indicated in the letter itself. The letter shall also indicate whether such documentation is required in original or certified copies thereof will suffice. 7. Upon receipt of such a letter by petitioners as well as by school concerned, the necessary consequential action shall be taken by said persons and school within a period of three weeks thereafter and upon receipt of such information, consequential action shall be taken by opposite party no. 5 within a period of four weeks upon receipt of such information. 8.
With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 15.1.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench