Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170150 (ALL)

NIRMALA SETH v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND 10 OTHERS

/11147/2024 · 2025-01-07

Brij Raj Singh, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:873-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11147 of 2024 Petitioner :- Nirmala Seth Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 6. 2. Considering the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to opposite parties no.7 to 11 is dispensed with. 3. There is a dispute between the petitioner and private opposite parties, which is not amenable to Writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner may avail other remedies as may be available in law. 4. Writ petition is dismissed with the aforesaid observation. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 7.1.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench