Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170133 (ALL)

SULTAN JAHAN v. THE COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION FIRST, DEVI PATAN MANDAL, BAHRAICH AND OTHERS

WRIC/11072/2024 · 2025-07-09

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39151 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11072 of 2024 Petitioner :- Sultan Jahan Respondent :- The Commissioner Administration First, Devi Patan Mandal, Bahraich And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ranjana Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Suresh Chandra Pandey Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Ms. Ranjana Agnihotri, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Suresh Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. The grievance raised by the petitioner before this Court is with regard to the proceedings being conducted by the Nayab Tehsildar, Bahraich, Devi Patan Mandal, Bahraich in Case No. RST/4451/2021 which is pending before him U/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The proceedings have been initiated by respondent No. 4 claiming herself to be legal heir of the recorded tenure holder. 3. The objections have been filed by the petitioner who had also moved an application for cross-examining the applicant before the Nayab Tehsildar but her grievance was that her application was not being decided and he is proceeding to decide the said matter without giving her adequate opportunity. 4. This aspect of the matter was raised by her before the revisional authority who has rejected her claim as per the impugned order. 5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines her prayer to a suitable direction to respondent No. 3 i.e. Nayab Tehsildar, Bahraich, Devi Patan Mandal, Bahraich to consider and decide the Case No. RST/4451/2021 with expedition to which learned counsel for respondents have no objection. 6. Accordingly, in light of the consent given by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the parties to appear before respondent No. 3 on the next date fixed. The respondent No. 3 shall endeavour to decide the said case on the next date and if for some reason the same cannot be decided on the said date he shall endeavour to decide the same finally within next three weeks after giving full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. 7. The parties before this Court undertake to cooperate in the proceedings before the respondent No. 3. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 9.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench