Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 137 CWP-2103-2025 Date of Decision.:27.01.2025 Rajinder Kumar Pe..oner Vs. State of Punjab and Others Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. APS Sidhu, Advocate for the peoner. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The grievance of the peoner is that without giving any noce or opportunity of hearing his pay has been reduced from 62,800/- to 58,800/- as on 01.01.2016.
2. It is contended that while implemenng the recommendaons of 6th Punjab Pay Commission, the pay of peoner was fixed at 61,000/- and a.er giving the annual increment his pay was fixed to be 62,800/-. However when the case of the peoner was sent for revision of the pension, then the office of respondent No.4 raised certain objecons and then instead of removing the objecons, the office of respondent No.6 at its own level reduced the pay of the peoner without giving him any opportunity of hearing or without following any Rule, Circular or Government instrucons.
3.
Learned counsel for the peoner also points out that detailed representaon dated 31.08.2024 (Annexure P-7) was also sent to respondent No.6 but not acon has been taken.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the peoner submits that he will be sasfied if representaon (Annexure P-7) is considered and decided by passing a speaking order in the me bound manner.
5. Noce of moon.
NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-2103-2025 -2-
6. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addional AG, Punjab accepts noce on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objecon to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the peoner.
7. I have heard learned counsel for the pares and have gone through the record of the case.
8. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the peoner in the present peon, respondent No.6 is directed to consider the grievances put forth by the peoner in representaon (Annexure P-7), in accordance with law, by passing a speaking
order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of cerfied copy of this order.
9. The peon stands disposed of.
( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE January 27, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.01.27 16:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document