[2025:JHHC:16910] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5059 of 2025 ------ Chanchal Sarkar aged about 28 years, son of Pradip Kumar Sarkar, Resident of Argoda Housing Colony, Near Argoda Chowk, P.O.- Ashok Nagar, P.S.- Doranda, Dist- Ranchi, At Present R/o Shree Shirdi Vinayak Dental Clinic, Patratu, P.O. & P.S.- Patratu, Dist.- Ramgarh .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Patratu P.S. Case No.104 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 75 (2), 351 (2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 8 and 10 of POCSO Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner caused sexual harassment and sexual assault upon the minor victim girl. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that the petitioner is a reputed dental practitioner. It is also submitted that for the self-same occurrence, the petitioner has also lodged Patratu P.S. Case No.105 of 2025 against the informant and others involving the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 126 (2), 303 (2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023. It is also submitted that this false case has been foisted by the informant only to save her skin from Patratu P.S. Case No.105 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 07.05.2025 as is evident from para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No.104 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/