DHANANJAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
ABAIL/2777/2024 · 2025-01-06
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:760
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2777 of 2024 Applicant :- Dhananjay Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Saksham Mishra,Mohd. Raziullah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A., Satyendra Singh Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.The present anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.37 of 2024 under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 364 I.P.C., 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Ashiyana, district Lucknow East. 2.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Satyendra Singh, Advocate who has filed vakalatnama for the respondent No.3 which is taken on record, and learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 3.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. The applicant is husband. General and bald allegation has been levelled. Allegation of beating has not been levelled on the applicant.
4. Learned Addl. Government Advocate, per contra, submits that the allegation is of committing cruelty by the in-laws of the victim, including the applicant who is husband. Complicity of the applicant is evident. It is not a case of false implication.The victim has suffered several injuries caused by hard and blunt object, although they are simple in nature. Bail to the co-accused Pintu Pandey has been declined by this Court vide order dated 31.8.2024 passed in Bail No.1980 of 2024 5.On due consideration to the fact that there is demand of dowry which is corroborated by the fact that the co-accused Pintu Pandey who is Jeth has received Rs.5 lacs in his bank account out of Rs.11 lacs and the rest has been paid in cash, the bail of co-accused Pintu Pandey has been rejected by this Court vide order referred to above, injuries received by the victim of occurrence, prima facie complicity of the applicant is evident. It is not a case of false implication.
6.No case for bail is made out. The application is rejected. Order Date :- 6.1.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench