IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11662 OF 2025 AMARAVATI Between: M. Nirmalamma, W/o. M. Nagabaya Reddy, Age Dealer of Shop No.1242017, 50 years, Occ; F.P.Shop R/o. Nadimipalli Village, Nallacheruvu Mandal, Sri SatyaSai District, Erstwhile Anantapur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh. Rep. by its Principal Secretary Supplies Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi 2. The District Collector, Sri SatyaSai District, Anantapur District. 3. The Joint Collector, Sri SatyaSai District, Anantapur District. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer; Kadiri, Anantapur District. 5. The Tahsildar, NallacheruvuMandal Anantapur District. , Civil , Amaravathi. at Anantapur Erstwhile at Anantapur, Erstwhile Sri Satya Said District Erstwhile Sri SatyaSai District, Erstwhile ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution the circumstances stated i of India praying that in in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction may more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 not allotting the essential in commodities to the F.P shop held by (Shop. SatyaSai District without the petitioner at Nadimipalli Village No. 1242017) there being any of NallacheruvuMandal, Sri ^ suspension or cancellation of authorization of the petitioner even though the authorization is valid and subsisting and also in issuing show cause notice vide Rc.No.F/141/2025 dated NIL 03.2025 by the 4th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14,.19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and System also violative of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution (Control) Order 2018 and principles of natural justice and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner hold F.P. shop Dealership of Nadimipalli Village (Shop. No. 1242017) of NallacheruvuMandal, Sri Satya Sai District. to \A NO: 1 OF 2C\9!i Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents continue the petitioner as F.P. shop Dealer and to supply essential commodities to the petitioner s fair price shop at Nadimipalli Village (Shop. No. 1242017) of NallacheruvuMandal SatyaSai District by suspendiWg Sri the show Rc.No.F/141/2025 dated NIL.03.2025, pending disposal of Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER cause notice vide r APHC010229602025 1/ y IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 11662/2025 the Between: ...PETITIONER M. NirmalaTinna AND ...RESPONDENT(S) i Others Of Andhra Pradesh a I SU The State Counsel for the Petitioner: '\ \ 1.KNARS1 REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking trie following relief; The r< fo issue a wr/f, order or d/recf/on more particularly one in ° ^rit of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 ^ llAotting the essential commodities to the F.P shop held by jJadimipalli Village (Shop. No. 1242017) of NallacheruvuMandal Sri gatyaSai District without there being any suspension or cancella ion of lathorization of the petitioner even though 'y/j'/po25 cMds/sf/ng and also in Issuing show cause notice vide igted NIL.03.2025 by the 4th respondent is illegal arbitrary and flies 14 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and also violative of Andhra state TarUd Public Distribution System (Control) Order 2018 and rPinciples of natural justice and set aside the same and co^segoenf/y ^recf ^ rLpondents to continue the petitioner to hold F.P. shop Dealership of the U 'U, ^ ', Sri SatyaSai as this Hon ble Court deems fit and proper. 2. During the course of hearing, learned that after filing the writ petition, the proceedings and seeks liberty to question the counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner was served with the suspension same. 3. Recording the above submission, liberty to the petitioner to challenge the respondents. There shall be no order as to costs the Writ Petition is closed, giving; suspension proceedings issued by the ^ As a sequel, miscellaneous pending petitions . if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G. HELA NAiDU assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri K. Narsi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Civil Supplies, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. Three CD Copies. ■ [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ANDS^ ORDER ?? 1 J!Il 2025 X m col: WP.No.11662of 2025 ^ . Current Ejection ^ I CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS