JAMEEL ANSARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/1573/2024 · 2025-01-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170108 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 170108 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:456
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1573 of 2024 Revisionist :- Jameel Ansari Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.The revision petition has been filed for setting aside impugned order dated 16.9.2024 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Sultanpur in Criminal Misc. Case No.975 of 2020 Haseena Bano and others versus Jameel Ansari, whereby the application filed by respondent No.2 has been partially allowed and the revisionist has been
directed to pay a sum of Rs.3000/- from the date of filing of the application. 2.Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. 3.A perusal of the record shows that the trial court has issued six issues. It is not in dispute that respondent No.2 is the legally wedded wife of the revisionist. She is residing away from the revisionist for sufficient cause. She is a destitute and incapable of maintaining herself and the revisionist has sufficient source of income. Considering all these, a sum of Rs.3000/- has been directed to be paid to respondent No.2 from the date of filing of the application, which in the opinion of this Court is just and proper. I find no illegality in the order impugned.
4.The revision, being devoid of merit, is dismissed.
Order Date :- 3.1.2025 kkb/ Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench