Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 170098 (ALL)

RAKESH CHAUDHARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE,LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WPIL/1120/2024 · 2025-01-03

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:257 Court No. - 19 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1120 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rakesh Chaudhari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shitla Prasad Tripathi,Amresh Singh,Pawan Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for opposite party no. 5. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite parties no. 6 to 9 stands dispensed with. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for removal of alleged illegal encroachment made by opposite parties no. 6 to 9 from the Chak Marg in the Naveen Parti land over Gata No. 119 having an area 0.1320 hectare sitauted in VillageKakraha Bodhwa Tehsil- Nanpara, District- Bahraich. With regard to aforesaid grievance, liberty is granted to petitioner to approach the authority concerned under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. In case any such application is filed, the competent authority shall take a final decision with regard to same expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing to opposite parties no. 6 to 8. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 3.1.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench